2006 Mazda 6 vs. 2010 Land Rover Freelander

To start off, 2010 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,179 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover Freelander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Land Rover Freelander (158 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 6. (134 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Freelander should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 6.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Land Rover Freelander (400 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 6. (310 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2010 Land Rover Freelander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Mazda 6 2010 Land Rover Freelander
Make Mazda Land Rover
Model 6 Freelander
Year Released 2006 2010
Body Type Station Wagon SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 2179 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 134 HP 158 HP
Engine RPM 3500 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 310 Nm 400 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 18.3:1 16.5:1
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Top Speed 195 km/hour 181 km/hour
Acceleration 0-100mph 10.4 seconds 10.9 seconds
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4710 mm 4510 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1930 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2670 mm