2006 Mazda 6 vs. 2010 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2010 Renault Scenic is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2010 Renault Scenic. (112 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Scenic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Scenic weights approximately 191 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Scenic. (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 2010 Renault Scenic | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 6 | Scenic |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1129 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |