2006 Mazda 6 vs. 2011 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2011 Renault Scenic is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,964 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 2011 Renault Scenic. (133 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2011 Renault Scenic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Renault Scenic weights approximately 405 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Renault Scenic. (191 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Renault Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 2011 Renault Scenic | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 6 | Scenic |
Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2964 cc | 1996 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1215 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |