2006 Mazda 6 vs. 2012 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2012 Holden Colorado is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP) has 92 more horse power than 2012 Holden Colorado. (123 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Colorado.
Because 2012 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Colorado. (207 Nm). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda 6 | 2012 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | 6 | Colorado |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 2400 cc |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 270 Nm | 207 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |