2006 Mazda 6 vs. 2012 Renault Symbol
To start off, 2012 Renault Symbol is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (216 HP) has 112 more horse power than 2012 Renault Symbol. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Symbol. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 6 weights approximately 120 kg more than 2012 Renault Symbol. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Symbol. (148 Nm). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Symbol.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda 6 | 2012 Renault Symbol | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | 6 | Symbol |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1598 cc |
| Horse Power | 216 HP | 104 HP |
| Torque | 270 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4261 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1639 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1439 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2473 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
