2006 Mazda B2300 vs. 1981 Volvo 240
To start off, 2006 Mazda B2300 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 2,314 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda B2300 (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1981 Volvo 240. (111 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda B2300 should accelerate faster than 1981 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda B2300 weights approximately 58 kg more than 1981 Volvo 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda B2300 (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Volvo 240. (185 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda B2300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda B2300 | 1981 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | B2300 | 240 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2314 cc |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1358 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2660 mm |