2006 Mazda B2300 vs. 1996 Seat Inca Kombi
To start off, 2006 Mazda B2300 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Seat Inca Kombi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Seat Inca Kombi would be higher. At 2,260 cc, 2006 Mazda B2300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda B2300 (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1996 Seat Inca Kombi. (59 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda B2300 should accelerate faster than 1996 Seat Inca Kombi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda B2300 weights approximately 323 kg more than 1996 Seat Inca Kombi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Mazda B2300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda B2300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Seat Inca Kombi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda B2300 (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Seat Inca Kombi. (108 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda B2300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Seat Inca Kombi.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda B2300 | 1996 Seat Inca Kombi | |
Make | Mazda | Seat |
Model | B2300 | Inca Kombi |
Year Released | 2006 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1391 cc |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1358 kg | 1035 kg |