2006 Mazda B2300 vs. 1997 Alfa Romeo 164
To start off, 2006 Mazda B2300 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Alfa Romeo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Alfa Romeo 164 would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Alfa Romeo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Alfa Romeo 164 weights approximately 152 kg more than 2006 Mazda B2300.
Because 2006 Mazda B2300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda B2300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Alfa Romeo 164, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda B2300 | 1997 Alfa Romeo 164 | |
| Make | Mazda | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | B2300 | 164 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2968 cc |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1358 kg | 1510 kg |
