2006 Mazda B2300 vs. 2004 Seat Inca Kombi

To start off, 2006 Mazda B2300 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Seat Inca Kombi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Seat Inca Kombi would be higher. At 2,260 cc, 2006 Mazda B2300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda B2300 (143 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2004 Seat Inca Kombi. (59 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda B2300 should accelerate faster than 2004 Seat Inca Kombi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda B2300 weights approximately 323 kg more than 2004 Seat Inca Kombi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2006 Mazda B2300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda B2300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Seat Inca Kombi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda B2300 (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Seat Inca Kombi. (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda B2300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Seat Inca Kombi.

Compare all specifications: