2006 Mazda B2300 vs. 2011 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2011 Kia Cadenza is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda B2300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda B2300 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Kia Cadenza (201 HP) has 58 more horse power than 2006 Mazda B2300. (143 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda B2300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 217 kg more than 2006 Mazda B2300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Mazda B2300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda B2300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Kia Cadenza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda B2300 | 2011 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | Mazda | Kia |
Model | B2300 | Cadenza |
Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2400 cc |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 201 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1358 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2845 mm |