2006 Mazda B2300 vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda B2300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda B2300 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 1271 kg more than 2006 Mazda B2300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 511 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda B2300. (209 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda B2300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda B2300 | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Mazda | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | B2300 | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5350 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 720 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1358 kg | 2629 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5612 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1987 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1598 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3320 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 10.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 9.8 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 100 L |
