2006 Mazda B3000 vs. 1966 Steyr Haflinger
To start off, 2006 Mazda B3000 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Steyr Haflinger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Steyr Haflinger would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda B3000 (154 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1966 Steyr Haflinger. (24 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 1966 Steyr Haflinger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 810 kg more than 1966 Steyr Haflinger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Steyr Haflinger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda B3000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Steyr Haflinger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda B3000 (244 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Steyr Haflinger. (41 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Steyr Haflinger.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda B3000 | 1966 Steyr Haflinger | |
Make | Mazda | Steyr |
Model | B3000 | Haflinger |
Year Released | 2006 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 641 cc |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 41 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 2840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1360 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 1510 mm |