2006 Mazda B3000 vs. 2002 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Mazda B3000 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda B3000 (154 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2002 Ford Ranger. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ranger weights approximately 310 kg more than 2006 Mazda B3000.
Because 2002 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda B3000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda B3000 (244 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ranger. (207 Nm). This means 2006 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda B3000 | 2002 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | B3000 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 2300 cc |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 55 L |
