2006 Mazda B3000 vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, both 2006 Mazda B3000 and 2006 Renault Clio were released in the same year (2006). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda B3000 (154 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2006 Renault Clio. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 180 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda B3000 (244 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Clio. (160 Nm @ 1700 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda B3000 | 2006 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | B3000 | Clio |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1461 cc |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 1700 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1230 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 4.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 55 L |
