2006 Mazda B3000 vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 88 more horse power than 2006 Mazda B3000. (154 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda B3000.
Because 2009 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda B3000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda B3000. (244 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda B3000 | 2009 Holden UTE | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | B3000 | UTE |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 3600 cc |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 244 Nm | 330 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |