2006 Mazda B3000 vs. 2010 Honda Accord
To start off, 2010 Honda Accord is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Accord (177 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2006 Mazda B3000. (154 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Accord should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda B3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Honda Accord weights approximately 43 kg more than 2006 Mazda B3000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda B3000 (244 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Honda Accord. (218 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Honda Accord.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda B3000 | 2010 Honda Accord | |
Make | Mazda | Honda |
Model | B3000 | Accord |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 2400 cc |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 218 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1453 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1847 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1476 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2799 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 70 L |