2006 Mazda B3000 vs. 2012 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2012 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 2006 Mazda B3000. (154 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda B3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 553 kg more than 2006 Mazda B3000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda B3000. (244 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda B3000 | 2012 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Mazda | Mazda |
| Model | B3000 | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 3700 cc |
| Horse Power | 154 HP | 273 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1963 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 5085 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1935 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1727 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2875 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 74 L | 76 L |
