2006 Mazda CX-7 vs. 1965 Simca 1000
To start off, 2006 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Simca 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Simca 1000 would be higher. At 2,298 cc, 2006 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1965 Simca 1000. (51 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1965 Simca 1000.
Because 1965 Simca 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Simca 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda CX-7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda CX-7 (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 277 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Simca 1000. (73 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Simca 1000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda CX-7 | 1965 Simca 1000 | |
| Make | Mazda | Simca |
| Model | CX-7 | 1000 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2298 cc | 944 cc |
| Horse Power | 244 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 73 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
