2006 Mazda CX-7 vs. 1970 Subaru R-2

To start off, 2006 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Subaru R-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Subaru R-2 would be higher. At 2,298 cc, 2006 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1970 Subaru R-2. (27 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1970 Subaru R-2.

Because 1970 Subaru R-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Subaru R-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda CX-7, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda CX-7 (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 310 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Subaru R-2. (40 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Subaru R-2. 2006 Mazda CX-7 has automatic transmission and 1970 Subaru R-2 has manual transmission. 1970 Subaru R-2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mazda CX-7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: