2006 Mazda CX-7 vs. 1995 Rover 214
To start off, 2006 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 214. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 214 would be higher. At 2,298 cc, 2006 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1995 Rover 214. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 214.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda CX-7 (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 214. (128 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 214. 2006 Mazda CX-7 has automatic transmission and 1995 Rover 214 has manual transmission. 1995 Rover 214 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mazda CX-7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda CX-7 | 1995 Rover 214 | |
| Make | Mazda | Rover |
| Model | CX-7 | 214 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2298 cc | 1396 cc |
| Horse Power | 244 HP | 102 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 128 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
