2006 Mazda CX-7 vs. 2008 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2008 Toyota Matrix is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda CX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda CX-7 would be higher. At 2,298 cc, 2006 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 2008 Toyota Matrix. (126 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 2008 Toyota Matrix.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda CX-7 (350 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Matrix. (165 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Matrix. 2006 Mazda CX-7 has automatic transmission and 2008 Toyota Matrix has manual transmission. 2008 Toyota Matrix will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mazda CX-7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda CX-7 | 2008 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | CX-7 | Matrix |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2298 cc | 1799 cc |
Horse Power | 244 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |