2006 Mazda Drifter vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2006 Mazda Drifter is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 2,606 cc, 2006 Mazda Drifter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda Drifter (123 HP) has 53 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Drifter should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda Drifter (206 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda Drifter will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda Drifter | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Mazda | MCC |
| Model | Drifter | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 2606 cc | 599 cc |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 206 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 1810 mm |
