2006 Mazda Drifter vs. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda Drifter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda Drifter would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro (426 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 303 more horse power than 2006 Mazda Drifter. (123 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda Drifter.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro (569 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 363 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda Drifter. (206 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda Drifter.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda Drifter | 2010 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
Model | Drifter | Camaro |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2606 cc | 6200 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 426 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 206 Nm | 569 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1377 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 72 L |