2006 Mazda Drifter vs. 2010 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2010 Toyota Matrix is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda Drifter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda Drifter would be higher. At 2,606 cc, 2006 Mazda Drifter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2006 Mazda Drifter. (123 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda Drifter.
Because 2006 Mazda Drifter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda Drifter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda Drifter. (206 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda Drifter.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda Drifter | 2010 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | Drifter | Matrix |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2606 cc | 2400 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 206 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4394 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 50 L |