2006 Mazda Drifter vs. 2012 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2012 Nissan Pixo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda Drifter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda Drifter would be higher. At 2,606 cc, 2006 Mazda Drifter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda Drifter (123 HP) has 55 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Drifter should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Pixo.
Because 2006 Mazda Drifter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda Drifter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda Drifter | 2012 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | Drifter | Pixo |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2606 cc | 996 cc |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2360 mm |
