2006 Mazda DrifterX vs. 1955 Rover P4
To start off, 2006 Mazda DrifterX is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda DrifterX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda DrifterX (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1955 Rover P4. (74 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda DrifterX should accelerate faster than 1955 Rover P4.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda DrifterX (257 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 Rover P4. (150 Nm). This means 2006 Mazda DrifterX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 Rover P4.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda DrifterX | 1955 Rover P4 | |
| Make | Mazda | Rover |
| Model | DrifterX | P4 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 2102 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 257 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 21.6:1 | 7.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 52 L |
