2006 Mazda DrifterX vs. 1963 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 2006 Mazda DrifterX is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda DrifterX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda DrifterX (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Vitesse. (70 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda DrifterX should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Vitesse.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda DrifterX (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Vitesse. (125 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda DrifterX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Vitesse.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda DrifterX | 1963 Triumph Vitesse | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | DrifterX | Vitesse |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 21.6:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 53 L |