2006 Mazda DrifterX vs. 1976 Mini MK IV
To start off, 2006 Mazda DrifterX is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mini MK IV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mini MK IV would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda DrifterX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda DrifterX (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1976 Mini MK IV. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda DrifterX should accelerate faster than 1976 Mini MK IV.
Because 2006 Mazda DrifterX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda DrifterX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Mini MK IV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda DrifterX (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mini MK IV. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda DrifterX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mini MK IV.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda DrifterX | 1976 Mini MK IV | |
Make | Mazda | Mini |
Model | DrifterX | MK IV |
Year Released | 2006 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 61 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 2040 mm |