2006 Mazda DrifterX vs. 1990 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Mazda DrifterX is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda DrifterX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda DrifterX (108 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1990 Renault Clio. (91 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda DrifterX should accelerate faster than 1990 Renault Clio.
Because 2006 Mazda DrifterX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda DrifterX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda DrifterX (257 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Renault Clio. (141 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda DrifterX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda DrifterX | 1990 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | DrifterX | Clio |
Year Released | 2006 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1721 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 257 Nm | 141 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1400 mm |