2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 vs. 1972 Datsun 240Z
To start off, 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Datsun 240Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Datsun 240Z would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Datsun 240Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 (275 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1972 Datsun 240Z. (151 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 should accelerate faster than 1972 Datsun 240Z.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 (380 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Datsun 240Z. (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Datsun 240Z.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 | 1972 Datsun 240Z | |
| Make | Mazda | Datsun |
| Model | MazdaSpeed6 | 240Z |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1972 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 2393 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 151 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 380 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2300 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 11 L/100km |
