2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 vs. 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe
To start off, 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 (274 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. (53 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 should accelerate faster than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 (380 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 300 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe. (80 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 | 1998 MCC Smart & Pulse City Coupe | |
Make | Mazda | MCC |
Model | MazdaSpeed6 | Smart & Pulse City Coupe |
Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 274 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 380 Nm | 80 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.4 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 4.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 22 L |