2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 would be higher. At 6,208 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK (877 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 603 more horse power than 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6. (274 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK (630 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6. (380 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 | 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | MazdaSpeed6 | CLK |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 6208 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 274 HP | 877 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 380 Nm | 630 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 14.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 62 L |