2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 vs. 2010 Ford Flex
To start off, 2010 Ford Flex is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Flex is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 (274 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2010 Ford Flex. (262 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Flex.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 (380 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford Flex. (336 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford Flex.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 | 2010 Ford Flex | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | MazdaSpeed6 | Flex |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 274 HP | 262 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 380 Nm | 336 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 5126 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1928 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2995 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 70 L |