2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 vs. 2013 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XK is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XK (542 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 268 more horse power than 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6. (274 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XK (681 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 301 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6. (380 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 | 2013 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Mazda | Jaguar |
Model | MazdaSpeed6 | XK |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 274 HP | 542 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 380 Nm | 681 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4794 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2032 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1322 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2752 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 9.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 14.5 L/100km |