2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 vs. 2013 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2013 Jeep Compass is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 (274 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 2013 Jeep Compass. (156 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 should accelerate faster than 2013 Jeep Compass.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 (380 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Jeep Compass. (191 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6 | 2013 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Mazda | Jeep |
Model | MazdaSpeed6 | Compass |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 274 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 380 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4448 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1811 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1651 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.4 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 51 L |