2006 Mazda MPV vs. 1979 Pontiac Trans Am
To start off, 2006 Mazda MPV is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Pontiac Trans Am. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Pontiac Trans Am would be higher. At 6,555 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Pontiac Trans Am is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Pontiac Trans Am (220 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2006 Mazda MPV. (200 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Pontiac Trans Am should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda MPV.
Because 1979 Pontiac Trans Am is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Pontiac Trans Am. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MPV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Pontiac Trans Am (434 Nm) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda MPV. (271 Nm). This means 1979 Pontiac Trans Am will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda MPV.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda MPV | 1979 Pontiac Trans Am | |
| Make | Mazda | Pontiac |
| Model | MPV | Trans Am |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1979 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2966 cc | 6555 cc |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 220 HP |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 434 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 5040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2750 mm |
