2006 Mazda MPV vs. 1997 Rover 200
To start off, 2006 Mazda MPV is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Rover 200 would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda MPV (200 HP) has 59 more horse power than 1997 Rover 200. (141 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 1997 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Rover 200 weights approximately 395 kg more than 2006 Mazda MPV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda MPV (271 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Rover 200. (185 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda MPV | 1997 Rover 200 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | MPV | 200 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1994 cc |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 141 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2510 mm |