2006 Mazda MPV vs. 1998 Rover 420
To start off, 2006 Mazda MPV is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 420. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 420 would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda MPV (200 HP) has 113 more horse power than 1998 Rover 420. (87 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 420. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda MPV weights approximately 227 kg more than 1998 Rover 420. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda MPV (271 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 420. (184 Nm). This means 2006 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 420.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda MPV | 1998 Rover 420 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | MPV | 420 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1992 cc |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 87 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 184 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1416 kg | 1189 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2750 mm |