2006 Mazda MPV vs. 2004 Renault Scenic II
To start off, 2006 Mazda MPV is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Renault Scenic II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Renault Scenic II would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda MPV (200 HP) has 38 more horse power than 2004 Renault Scenic II. (162 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Scenic II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Scenic II weights approximately 615 kg more than 2006 Mazda MPV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 271 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda MPV | 2004 Renault Scenic II | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | MPV | Scenic II |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Minivan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 162 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1425 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.4 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 60 L |