2006 Mazda MPV vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Mazda MPV is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda MPV (200 HP) has 126 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda MPV weights approximately 281 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda MPV (271 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda MPV | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | MPV | Clio |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1390 cc |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1416 kg | 1135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.4 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 55 L |