2006 Mazda MPV vs. 2006 Rover 75
To start off, both 2006 Mazda MPV and 2006 Rover 75 were released in the same year (2006). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda MPV (200 HP) has 52 more horse power than 2006 Rover 75. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 2006 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda MPV weights approximately 236 kg more than 2006 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda MPV (271 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Rover 75. (215 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda MPV | 2006 Rover 75 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | MPV | 75 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1796 cc |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1416 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 11.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 65 L |