2006 Mazda MPV vs. 2008 Volvo C70
To start off, 2008 Volvo C70 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volvo C70 (227 HP) has 27 more horse power than 2006 Mazda MPV. (200 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda MPV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo C70 weights approximately 788 kg more than 2006 Mazda MPV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo C70 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda MPV. (271 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda MPV.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda MPV | 2008 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | MPV | C70 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 2520 cc |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 227 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1598 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 62 L |