2006 Mazda MPV vs. 2009 Fiat Stilo
To start off, 2009 Fiat Stilo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 2,966 cc, 2006 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda MPV (200 HP) has 132 more horse power than 2009 Fiat Stilo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 2009 Fiat Stilo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Fiat Stilo weights approximately 455 kg more than 2006 Mazda MPV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda MPV (271 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Fiat Stilo. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Fiat Stilo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda MPV | 2009 Fiat Stilo | |
Make | Mazda | Fiat |
Model | MPV | Stilo |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1596 cc |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 68 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1265 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 58 L |