2006 Mazda MPV vs. 2009 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2009 Holden Caprice is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Caprice (278 HP) has 78 more horse power than 2006 Mazda MPV. (200 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda MPV.
Because 2009 Holden Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda MPV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Caprice (350 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda MPV. (271 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda MPV.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda MPV | 2009 Holden Caprice | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | MPV | Caprice |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 3600 cc |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |