2006 Mazda MPV vs. 2010 Volvo S80
To start off, 2010 Volvo S80 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo S80 (311 HP) has 111 more horse power than 2006 Mazda MPV. (200 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda MPV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo S80 weights approximately 168 kg more than 2006 Mazda MPV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Volvo S80 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda MPV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo S80 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo S80 (440 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda MPV. (271 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Volvo S80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda MPV.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda MPV | 2010 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | MPV | S80 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 4400 cc |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 311 HP |
Torque | 271 Nm | 440 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3950 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1711 kg | 1879 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4851 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1494 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2835 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 70 L |