2006 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,777 cc (6 cylinders), 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda RX-8 | 1957 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
| Make | Mazda | Studebaker |
| Model | RX-8 | Sky Hawk |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1957 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1311 cc | 2777 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 212 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2980 mm |
