2006 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1964 Opel Rekord
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Opel Rekord is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (108 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1964 Opel Rekord. (53 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1964 Opel Rekord.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (140 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Opel Rekord. (108 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Opel Rekord.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda RX-8 | 1964 Opel Rekord | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | RX-8 | Rekord |
Year Released | 2006 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 140 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2650 mm |