2006 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1964 Singer Vogue III
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Singer Vogue III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Singer Vogue III would be higher. At 1,592 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Singer Vogue III is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1964 Singer Vogue III. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1964 Singer Vogue III. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 336 kg more than 1964 Singer Vogue III. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Mazda RX-8 | 1964 Singer Vogue III | |
| Make | Mazda | Singer |
| Model | RX-8 | Vogue III |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1308 cc | 1592 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 81.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Top Speed | 235 km/hour | 148 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1428 kg | 1092 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 47 L |
