2006 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1965 NSU 1200

To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 NSU 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 NSU 1200 would be higher. At 1,308 cc, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (108 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1965 NSU 1200. (54 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1965 NSU 1200.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (140 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 NSU 1200. (83 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 NSU 1200. 2006 Mazda RX-8 has automatic transmission and 1965 NSU 1200 has manual transmission. 1965 NSU 1200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Mazda RX-8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Mazda RX-8 1965 NSU 1200
Make Mazda NSU
Model RX-8 1200
Year Released 2006 1965
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 1308 cc 1177 cc
Engine Type dual-disk rotary in-line
Horse Power 108 HP 54 HP
Engine RPM 8200 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 140 Nm 83 Nm
Torque RPM 5500 RPM 3500 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4430 mm 4010 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1510 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2440 mm