2006 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1965 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 2,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1965 Plymouth Valiant. (100 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1965 Plymouth Valiant.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Mazda RX-8 | 1965 Plymouth Valiant | |
Make | Mazda | Plymouth |
Model | RX-8 | Valiant |
Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 2789 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2700 mm |